Jump to content

Talk:Joey Carbstrong/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:06, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Neutrality

[edit]

There has been much editing recently, some adding content which paints the subject quite poorly and others which appear to whitewash him completely. The truth should be objective and simply state the facts about the subject without adding opinion as to the morality of his actions - good or bad. Ifnord (talk) 23:08, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I took a stab at adding specific, referenced information about his criminal history as the article said he was incarcerated for an unknown reason. It's not unknown. Ifnord (talk) 17:07, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Ifnord: I had a go at fixing this article. The only issue might be using extensive quotes from Carbstrong himself. I am not going to remove those right now without asking someone else but it runs into the issue of WP:UNDUE. Psychologist Guy (talk) 04:19, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Edit by Paul12116

[edit]

@Paul12116: can you explain your edit [1] which is original research. Firstly, "attempted to argue" is wrong. He did not "attempt" to argue anything. He argued, not attempted. Anyone can argue anything, attempt does not come into it. It is not up to Wikipedia editors to say if he is right or wrong, we merely report what reliable sources say. The source itself does not say he "attempted" to argue [2]. Please do not continue to make this WP:POINT. Psychologist Guy (talk) 23:05, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine, not to worry I'll be starting a new subheading concerning criticism and false claims made by Joseph Armstrong also his upcoming prosecution for tax evasion in the UK.

Paul12116 (talk) 00:11, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your correct that the source didn't say attempted to argue nor did it say that he argued either. It says 'heated debate' therefore either we are both wrong or both correct which one is it. Paul12116 (talk) 00:14, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]