Jump to content

Talk:John Benbow/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Starting review. Pyrotec (talk) 13:26, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Initial comments

[edit]

Having fairly quickly scanned through the article, it appears to be quite a reasonable article. As it appears to be at or about GA-level I'll do a more detailed review, section by section but leaving the WP:lead until last, against WP:WIAGA. 13:44, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

Overall summary

[edit]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


A comprehensive and wide ranging article. Compliant with WP:WIAGA

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    Well referenced
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
    Well illustrated
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
    An outstanding GA

Contratuations on the quality of the article. Its certainly of GA-standard; and possibly a strong contender for WP:FAC. I'm awarding GA-status. Pyrotec (talk) 18:54, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]