Talk:Joseph Carpenter Silversmith Shop/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sven Manguard (talk · contribs) 23:25, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

GAN Quicksheet 1.24 SM
(Criteria)

Starting comments: This needs a copyedit, but is otherwise in pretty solid shape right now. Sven Manguard Wha? 23:25, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

1. Well written: Section acceptable

a. prose/copyright: Acceptable

• I did some copyediting, but I don't think that any of it was "major" (nothing conceptual, nothing controversial). You used "it" a couple too many times this time around.

b. MoS compliance: Acceptable

2. Accurate and verifiable: Section acceptable

a. provides references: Acceptable

b. proper citation use: Acceptable

• Unless I'm missing something, the " Accompanying 14 photos, from 1970, 1972, and undated" part of the fifth source isn't relevant to this article. That's not a problem, you can leave it in, but I'm not sure it makes sense to include it.

c. no original research: Acceptable

• AGF on Fodor's Modern Guides New England for paraphrasing, 2b, and 2c concerns.

3. Broad in coverage: Section acceptable

a. covers main aspects: Acceptable

b. focused/on topic: Acceptable

4. Neutral: Acceptable

5. Stable: Acceptable

6. Image use: Section acceptable

a. license/tagging correct: Acceptable

• I cleaned up the file description page on Commons, although it was mainly putting the information in the correct slots. A modern photograph of the building would be nice, if you could find one.

b. relevant/properly captioned: Acceptable

7. Additional items not required for a GA, but requested by the reviewer: Section acceptable

a. images that should have alt texts have them: N/A

b. general catch all and aesthetics: Acceptable

Comments after the initial review: This was an easy one. Still waiting on you for responses to issues in the other GAN I'm doing, but this one is fine as is. PROMOTED Sven Manguard Wha? 01:47, 27 April 2014 (UTC)