Talk:Journal Watch

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Are articles tagged by bots?[edit]

The article is not written like an advert, it is simply factual, it is organized just fine, and it refers only to a primary source because there are no secondary sources. The tags are just stupid and waste people's time.--Sanjam da prdnem na tebe (talk) 06:47, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Link to official site?[edit]

The link to the official Journal Watch site was deleted, along with a request that I see the Spam and External links policy. The latter, under What should be linked, specifically says "Articles about any organization, person, web site, or other entity should link to the official site if any." The deletion and reference contradict each other. Erikd7 06:45, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Journal Watch. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061004032542/http://content.nejm.org/ to http://content.nejm.org/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:45, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]