Talk:Joy (Phish album)

Untitled

I am very skeptical.

Come on now. How is this not deleted? "Disc One will be entirely instrumental, aside from "Strange Design"..." How do you explain Makisupa, NICU, and Tube on Disc One? If you're going to make a joke page, don't half-ass it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.11.93.210 (talk) 17:39, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The album is being finalized. As of April 19, the entire first disc WAS instrumental, except "Strange Design," during late night/early morning sessions on April 19/April 20 several other songs were inserted and a shorter version of "2001". The passage you are referring to is outdated, thanks for spotting that...I'm deleting it now. It probably slipped by my radar since I've had to repeatedly remove vandalism from this page. LVPHSH (talk) 21:11, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lies, and not very funny ones at that.

--muckster (talk) 21:12, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If there were some information, somewhere, anywhere on the internet about this...maybe...otherwise...HOAX > SPEEDY DELETION. 141.166.86.98 (talk) 02:46, 21 April 2009 (UTC) i for one am stoked that kang will be taking the lead on all solos. V krishna (talk) 23:54, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

To reiterate: Lies, and not very funny ones at that. As if anyone really believes a source that is posting on wikipedia of all places (as if this were the proper channel to release the info), and has no established credibility whatsoever! Your joke is old already. 155.47.186.45 (talk) 00:59, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Trying to make this article as legit as possible

I've just revised the article based upon information "known" as of 22 April, 2009. It isn't a hoax, for instance, that the album is being recorded or that Steve Lillywhite is producing. It's widely rumored that the title will be Party Time! and it is true that an image (of questionable authenticity) was released with a potential tracklisting. I added the "future album" tag, and I've made every effort to distinguish between rumored and completely verifiable information. Wikipedia content should be "verifiable" but obviously this term has a rather flexible meaning when something is labeled as "future album," in my mind at least. There is certainly a difference between posting "tracks" based upon that image and posting tracks that just come out of nowhere. I feel as if the "future album" tag and the in-text caveats legitimize this article as a chronicle (on 22 April, 2009) of how things stand with Phish's forthcoming album. Cheers. JustaPhan (talk) 17:32, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Added information about the Billboard (magazine) memo and its rumored tracklist, title, and release date for the upcoming album. JustaPhan (talk) 17:27, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Continued Vandalism

As of 28 April, 2009 I'm finding repeated nonsensical vandalism of this article. Two rumors with sources have surfaced about this forthcoming album. One photographic source, another email-based source. The tracklistings provided account for those two sources. Continuing to vandalize information that is sourced will result in all non-sourced edits being reverted, which would be a bad thing on a "future album" article. JustaPhan (talk) 18:10, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Is the Billboard "Light" tracklist worth being on the article at all?

The second tracklist ("Light (Yellow)"), on the page, which early in the article is described as having a release date of June 2, is pretty clearly bogus. June 2 has come and gone, and Phish has already played a number of songs exclusive to the "Party Time!" tracklist; "Time Turns Elastic" was released as a single last Tuesday, "Ocelot" was played at Fenway last Sunday, and "Kill Devil Falls" and "Stealing Time From The Faulty Plan" were done this Tuesday at Jones Beach. Are there any objections to removing it? --Tenniru (talk) 04:29, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Right, well, I'm doing it tomorrow. --Tenniru (talk) 17:36, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]