Talk:Kepler-40
Kepler-40 has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on May 14, 2011. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that, at the time of its discovery, KOI-428 was the largest and most evolved star known to host a transiting planet? |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
Comment
[edit]There is an inconsistency (in two places) in the description of KOI-428. In the sidebar it is reported as having a mass of 1.48 M(sun), and in the introduction as "approximately 1.5 times more massive than the Sun." However, at two other places in the text (in Observational History and in Characteristics), it is described as having a mass "over 1.8 times that of the Sun."75.48.21.214 (talk) 05:01, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:KOI-428/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 20:10, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.
Disambiguations: none found.
Linkrot: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 20:15, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
Checking against GA criteria
[edit]- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- AS noted previously, the PDF[1] is very slow to download.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- Suffient detail for a recently discovered star
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- no images used
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- This article meets the criteria so it is passed. Jezhotwells (talk) 20:20, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail:
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 17:06, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
- Wikipedia good articles
- Natural sciences good articles
- Wikipedia Did you know articles that are good articles
- GA-Class Astronomy articles
- Low-importance Astronomy articles
- GA-Class Astronomy articles of Low-importance
- GA-Class Astronomical objects articles
- Pages within the scope of WikiProject Astronomical objects (WP Astronomy Banner)