Talk:Kaiser-class battleship/GA1
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
I will review the article shortly. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 00:37, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
b (MoS):
- The description of the armor scheme for the casemate guns is unclear. This began a confused 2 hour long battle between the British destroyers and the German cruiser and destroyer screen, repeatedly at very close range. This doesn't make sense unless it's a typo for reportedly at close range
- I changed it to "frequently", does that make more sense? Parsecboy (talk) 01:20, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
- The description of the armor scheme for the casemate guns is unclear. This began a confused 2 hour long battle between the British destroyers and the German cruiser and destroyer screen, repeatedly at very close range. This doesn't make sense unless it's a typo for reportedly at close range
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- What is the thickness of the turret face armor?
- Groner's doesn't state what the turret faces were, just the sides and roof. Conway's simply has "turrets: 300-80mm." I'd assume the faces were as thick as the sides--300mm. Parsecboy (talk) 01:20, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
- What is the thickness of the turret face armor?
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- No edit wars etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
