Talk:Karen Kwiatkowski/Archive 1
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
WTF, Rogerman?
Do you have reason to doubt she has an MA? Putting in stuff like "A website lists her as having an MA" appears to be very POV in terms of casting doubt on a claim that is easily checked. Why erase what appears to be well-known information about her background? Shall we go to the George W Bush page and insert that he only "claims" to have gone to Yale? If you want to research the info and either find sources to support it or show that it is invalid, please do so, but why are you taking it off the page without any reason to doubt it?--csloat 20:55, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
911 ct template
The template doesn't belong here. It may be applicable elsewhere, but nowhere on this page is it claimed that 911 was a conspiracy. Not everyone who is critical of the Bush Administration believes there was no plane at the pentagon or whatever. Please do not restore the template. Thanks. csloat 01:22, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
- What are you saying? This article doesn’t mention Karen's thoughts regarding 9/11? That needs to be fixed. Here's a quote:
- "It is as a scientist that I have the most trouble with the official government conspiracy theory, mainly because it does not satisfy the rules of probability or physics. The collapses of the World Trade Center buildings clearly violate the laws of probability and physics.";
- she said so in this book; here is the summary, just scroll down to see it… anyway, if you are active on this article feel free (be kind;) and use this references to add relevant data. Regards. Lovelight 01:34, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
- She's criticizing a government conspiracy theory there, not embracing her own. The template is iffy here at best, and it really doesn't belong. csloat 01:43, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
- of course she's not, I'm aware of her work, admire her strength, as well as her honesty, that's why I'm pushing this, because enough is enough… decent people who are asking serious questions are not conspiracy theorists. The growth of the template will show this, in time; properly renamed it will serve a good purpose, that’s all. Please, don’t take this personally; we are striving to make things better here. Right? Lovelight 01:49, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
- I'm not taking it personally, but it appears that you are engaged in WP:POINT. csloat 01:58, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
- of course she's not, I'm aware of her work, admire her strength, as well as her honesty, that's why I'm pushing this, because enough is enough… decent people who are asking serious questions are not conspiracy theorists. The growth of the template will show this, in time; properly renamed it will serve a good purpose, that’s all. Please, don’t take this personally; we are striving to make things better here. Right? Lovelight 01:49, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
- She's criticizing a government conspiracy theory there, not embracing her own. The template is iffy here at best, and it really doesn't belong. csloat 01:43, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
Slanted and biased
It looks like this page was just created by the person to promote them seff. Slanted and biased. Attractive presidential candidate? No way. Nice lady, but not ready to be president. Try running for state legislature, sherrif, or some other local office first. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.116.212.32 (talk) 21:07, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
- Where do you see that she is running for president? She is running for Congress,..Hello? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.53.115.154 (talk) 22:13, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
I see how it is. This does not look good for the subject of the article and this is a biased article. There is a picture whith five people at the announcement! No one showed up. This article is overblown. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.116.212.23 (talk) 12:43, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
- Where does it say in the reference you provided that only five people attended her announcement? --CutOffTies (talk) 21:19, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
- Your analysis of a photo does not verify. --CutOffTies (talk) 13:01, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Karen Kwiatkowski. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20041205002534/http://www.nationalreview.com:80/rubin/rubin200405180836.asp to http://www.nationalreview.com/rubin/rubin200405180836.asp
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20050515202731/http://rpc.senate.gov:80/_files/iraq%20pentagon%20csis%20speech.pdf to http://rpc.senate.gov/_files/iraq%20pentagon%20csis%20speech.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071213031309/http://academicsforpaul.com:80/ to http://www.academicsforpaul.com
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 21:02, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Karen Kwiatkowski. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20140226163127/http://www.commondreams.org:80/views04/0310-09.htm to http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0310-09.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070927004903/http://www.defenddemocracy.org/in_the_media/in_the_media_show.htm?doc_id=215712 to http://www.defenddemocracy.org/in_the_media/in_the_media_show.htm?doc_id=215712
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20050209002158/http://www.lp.org:80/lpnews/0406/convention-speaker.html to http://www.lp.org/lpnews/0406/convention-speaker.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:27, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
Karen Kwiatkowski is a part-time professor
Karent Kiwatkowski was a part-time professor at Lord Fairfax Community College but her contract was not renewed several years ago. Is she still teaching at another college? If not, this statement should be removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:5CE:4381:1C60:4138:7A4A:8F46:477F (talk) 12:54, 8 October 2020 (UTC)