Talk:Kargil War order of battle

Military history: Asian / Indian / South Asia Start‑class

This page is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Start

This page does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Asian military history task force
	Indian military history task force
	South Asian military history task force

Concerns

You can't have a "Kargil Order of Battle" as Kargil is not a country (at least that is how I understand Order of Battles to work). The notability thing is still about what makes these particular Order of Battles important/significant enough for inclusion within an encyclopedia. Why is an intelligence report (which very well could be wrong) being considered a reliable source? Is there perhaps a better way to format the information so it is less a listing and more encyclopedic? Jasynnash2 (talk) 08:46, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I just saw the Kargil orbat and Jasynnash comment. First, you do not list an orbat by me and Mandeep Singh Bajwa as just another single source orbat. I am since `1971 the Grand Old Dad of Indian and Pakistani orbats, and since I have retired, Mandeep has taken over. There is little he or I dont know. And until the Indian army publishes a book on Kargil, you will not get another source. Nonetheless, the Kargil orbat is incomplete for various reasons I cant go into and I think that's made clear in our original article. And while Mandeep and I do make mistakes, given the mature of the job (and sometimes we have to deliberately obscure information) we aren't just another intel source! Of course, neither one of us posted this orbat on Wikipedia, someone else took it from something we wrote.

Second, Jasynnash, you can have an orbat for a country, a battle, or an operation. By their very nature, orbats are simple listings of units, there is never any other elaboration given. Military grade orbats, which we could not do on India and Pakistan because we'd be led off in handcuffs, differ from ours in this respect: a military grade orbat will have the manpower strength of each unit, as well a list of operational equipment. In the military, only the DMI/DMO will have a complete country orbat. Field formations are given the information they need to know, and generally sniffing for info on what another formation faces is liable to get you into trouble.

Hope this clarifies things. if anyone comes across other units, please do let us know on rikhye1@hotmail.com, but be sure to include the source (newspaper, magazine, uncle who served in the sector, etc) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.59.165.217 (talk) 00:26, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's Pakistan land Ali hamza ah (talk) 15:25, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hero of kargil

Hero of kargil Ali hamza ah (talk) 15:26, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

this is information website not isi propoganda asset. Refrain from self promotion Ankraj giri (talk) 15:23, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kargil order of battle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070704044414/http://www.ordersofbattle.darkscape.net/site/history/index.html to http://www.ordersofbattle.darkscape.net/site/history/index.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:12, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]