Talk:Kayak Point County Park/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) 10:19, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

• Lead is too brief, I'd expect to see at least twice as much detail than the three sentences which are currently provided, especially as most of the lead is already noted in the infobox.
  • Y Expanded the lead.
• I would urge caution over wikilinking common terms like "beach" or "sand".
  • Y Fixed
• "3 ft (1 m) [1]" space between measurement and reference is unnecessary.
  • N The space is inserted by the infobox
• Seattle is linked second time round.
  • Y Fixed
• "$75 each," might be interesting to see what that's worth in current values?
  • Y Added inflation-adjusted figure
• "$100 million refinery" similar, as $100m in 1967 is probably quite a substantial investment.
  • Y Added inflation-adjusted figure
• "Atlantic Ritchfield" typo.
  • Y Fixed
• "Washington State Supreme Court" doesn't appear to have the word "State" in its official title.
  • Y Fixed
• "Kayak Point is a cuspate foreland on..." suddenly linking Kayak Point here?
  • Y Removed
• "cabins" is a dab link.
  • Y Removed

Neat work, a few minor points to address, so on hold. The Rambling Man (talk) 10:35, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

@The Rambling Man: Thanks for the review. I've addressed all but one of your points (the remaining one is out of my control and hopefully not too big of a bother). SounderBruce 15:10, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

Okeydokey, pesky infobox format aside (and noted that it's outside the scope of the GA review really), happy with this, so I'll promote, good job. The Rambling Man (talk) 08:29, 17 August 2017 (UTC)