Talk:Kepler-4
Appearance
Kepler-4 has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Kepler-4/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: CrowzRSA 01:53, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
I've made a few fixes to the article, mainly word choice. The article is very short, but it meets the criteria, so I'll pass it. CrowzRSA 01:53, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
Start a discussion about improving the Kepler-4 page
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve the "Kepler-4" page.