Talk:Kerygmachela

Animals Low‑importance

Kerygmachela is within the scope of WikiProject Animals, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to animals and zoology. For more information, visit the project page.AnimalsWikipedia:WikiProject AnimalsTemplate:WikiProject Animalsanimal articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Animals To-do:

Here are some Open Tasks :

Copyedit:
Merge: GLAM/ARKive donated texts into articles about endangered species.
Improve: Photoperiodism, Tool use by non-human animals, Omnivore, Animal suicide, Sphaerium beckmani (a species in family Sphaeriidae),
Requests:
- Mammals:
- Invertebrates: Campocraspedon
- Fishes: Zaniolepis frenata
Merge: GLAM/ARKive donated texts into articles about endangered species.
Expand: Junqueira cow, Atka mackerel
Nominate and vote: Science collaboration of the month, Article Improvement Drive, WikiProject Animals Collaboration

Palaeontology Low‑importance

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Clearification required[edit]

Is Dinocaridida a phylum or a class? Taxbox for Anomalicaris shows

The taxon Anomalocarididae is missing there!

Could anyone please correct this and make it consistent? Thanks in advance Ernsts (talk) 19:24, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kerygmachela. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070207101947/http://www.palaeos.com/Invertebrates/Arthropods/Anomalocarida/Kerygmachela.html to http://www.palaeos.com/Invertebrates/Arthropods/Anomalocarida/Kerygmachela.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:52, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As I understand it, "Euarthropoda" in its modern usage (and when used as a crown group) is limited to species with jointed appendages. However, Kerygmachela and other Lobopods do not have jointed appendages. Accordingly, Kerygmachela and other Lobopods are Panarthropods within the stem-group of Euarthropoda. If I am correct, then the taxbox of this article should be modified to substitute Panarthropoda for Euarthropoda. I will wait 30 days before making this change to allow others to provide input or correct me. Ray Glock-GrueneichRay Glock-Grueneich (talk) 16:18, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I would make the appropriate edit, but, I do not yet understand how to edit the automatic taxoboxes. I suggest being bold.--Mr Fink (talk) 21:40, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]