Talk:kexec

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Kexec article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Computing: Software Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Low-importance).

Linux Low‑importance

	Linux portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linux, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Linux on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinuxWikipedia:WikiProject LinuxTemplate:WikiProject LinuxLinux articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Compatibility with Different Arches

According to the little information that is out there, the kexec-tools toolset is only available for 32-bit Intel architecture. Is this still true or dated? I cannot find anywhere that says otherwise definitively. Alharaka (talk) 07:34, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

can we get an example???? kexec /boot/vmlinuz-4.0.2 ? is this how i does it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.129.13.155 (talk) 17:12, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

In general, Wikipedia is not a howto. Thus, please consult some of the references or external links for the ways kexec is actually used. — Dsimic (talk | contribs) 17:26, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]