Talk:Kings of Shambhala

This article was nominated for deletion on 16 November 2024. The result of the discussion was redirect.

Dear Authors,

Please kindly consider another two minor but by all means not insignificant observations.

A. Kalki King Sumitra (#5) would appreciate being called by his Exact Name - Sumitraui.

B. Kalki King Vikranta (#19) would be exalted if his name was spelled correctly as in the official Shambhala court legal documents which were recovered in Egypt recently (Vikranta Marbose Kor).

Please don't ask me how I know that information (it's still in my memory). I won't be able to disclose that until the complete and verified (hopefully in this decade) translation of the discovered historic treasures is made available to the Community of Believers.

Light and Peace Forever and Ever

SVL

10/28/2010 Los Angeles, California 90017 USA

END OF COMMENTS.

75.4.222.234 (talk) 03:23, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Authors.

I have a comment about your article about the Magnificent Shambhala royal lineage (Kings of Shambhala).

You list 32 kings. I don't dispute that at the moment.

However, then you talk about reincarnated lamas (last section and paragraph).

In my humble opinion, the last section called 'The Lineage of Sakyong Kings' does not belong in this article. Lamas are NOT NOT NOT kings, although High Kings are always Teachers of Dharma. I don't want however to make any edits to your work without further detailed and exhaustive research.

Also, my sanskrit is a bit stale, but I for some reason think that "Sakyong" literally means "earth-defender" in Sanskrit. You say Tibetan and 'protector'. I might be awfully erring about that translation. I apologize profusely if I am.

Please let me know where I can find biographies of these venerable Kings of Shambhala (levin_stan@yahoo.com).

With deep respects,

Light and Peace.

10/28/2010 Los Angeles, California 90017 USA

END OF COMMENT.

75.4.222.234 (talk) 02:43, 29 October 2010 (UTC) I think the dates on this might be wrong. If Suchandra lived from 900 BCE to 876 BCE, and Siddhartha Gautama lived from 563 BCE to 483 BCE (all approximate dates), how could he have received the Kalachakra from him? By these dates Suchandra died a long time before the Buddha was born. --Horses In The Sky 10:51, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Good observation. I think there is probably an esoteric explanation for it. I'm going to invite Rudy, the webmaster of "Kalachakra.net", to comment. Sylvain1972 13:43, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

Hi this is Rudy (rudyh01 login)- not sure how to use this discussion forum, but trying... Anyway, you are very right! Point is that according to the Kalachakra calculations, Shakyamuni Buddha lived quite a bit earlier then the generally accepted dates; perhaps we could make a brief note of that. As nobody knows the exact dates anyway, there is not necessarily a 'right' and 'wrong' in this...

Welcome, Rudy -- very glad to see you contributing here at WP. You can use four tildes (~~~~) after your comments on any page to have your username automatically added.Zero sharp 18:10, 21 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This early date for Gautama Buddha is supported in Vedic tradition, too. See findings of Prasad Gokhale at http://www.veda.harekrsna.cz/encyclopedia/demigods.htm#3 Jan 82.208.2.214 19:20, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What is the diffrence between the Kings of Shambhala and Maitreya? NicholasPrakash 05:03, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think Maitreya is forecast to come much later. It's an interesting question though. I'm not sure how congruent the two prophesies are, if that's what you mean. Sylvain1972 15:50, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

Reference

Hi,

There is literally no reference for the list of the kings. Can anyone provide some? -- 49.136.169.82 (talk) 19:47, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kings of Shambhala. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140327125134/http://kalachakranet.org/kalachakra_tantra_history.html to http://kalachakranet.org/kalachakra_tantra_history.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:34, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]