Talk:Klaus and Greta/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Rcej (Robert) - talk 06:10, 6 August 2010 (UTC) Cool! Just one thing: the url in ref #15 is incorrect. Rcej (Robert) - talk 06:10, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

I fixed the link it seems the page was removed but I found a Google cache of it. Would that work? ♪♫Alucard 16♫♪ 09:04, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

Thank you Alucard, I appreciate you fixing the link. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 15:21, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

No problem ThinkBlue, glad to help. Nice to take a break from Big Brother articles once in a while. ♪♫Alucard 16♫♪ 01:54, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

Good :) Tis a pass! Rcej (Robert) - talk 05:51, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

Results of review

GA review (see here for criteria)

---

The article Klaus and Greta passes this review, and has been upgraded to good article status. The article is found by the reviewing editor to be deserving of good article status based on the following criteria:

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail: Pass