Talk:Krzyzanowskisaurus

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Krzyzanowskisaurus article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Palaeontology Mid‑importance

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Amphibians and Reptiles Low‑importance

	Krzyzanowskisaurus is part of WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles, an effort to make Wikipedia a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource for amphibians and reptiles. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Amphibians and ReptilesWikipedia:WikiProject Amphibians and ReptilesTemplate:WikiProject Amphibians and Reptilesamphibian and reptile articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Justin Tweet updated the Dinosauromorpha page by removing Krzyzanowskisaurus from this page, saying that this genus represents a pseudosuchian like Revueltosaurus. He considered the possibility that Krzyzanowskisaurus, despite having a cingulum on the teeth, might have represented an archosaur whose cingulum evolved independently of ornithischians. 72.194.116.63 15:59, 10 April 2007 (UTC) Vahe Demirjian 11.25 10 April 2007[reply]

Yup, that's pretty much how it was stated in Irmis, R.B., Parker, W.G., Nesbitt, S.J., and Liu, J. (2006); in fact, it might just be another species of Revueltosaurus, as was originally proposed. J. Spencer 21:19, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]