Talk:Lê Văn Duyệt/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Parsecboy (talk) 12:57, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
b (MoS):
- Minor question: is the "goddes" mentioned in the Family and personal life section supposed to be "goddess?" Also, in the Conflict section, there's the word "rorting;" is that a typo as well (or just something I'm not familiar with)?
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- a (fair representation):
b (all significant views):
- a (fair representation):
- It is stable.
- It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
- a (tagged and captioned):
b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA):
c (non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Images all look good.
- a (tagged and captioned):
- Overall:
- a Pass/Fail:
- Excellent work on this article, which is quite interesting to read. There's just a couple typos and the one missing footnote holding the article up from passing. I made a series of edits to the article, you might want to check and make sure everything is correct. Parsecboy (talk) 12:57, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
- a Pass/Fail:
- Citations added as you requested and I also fixed some typo. Thank a lot for your review.--AM (talk) 16:15, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
- Ok, everything looks good to me. Parsecboy (talk) 16:50, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
- Citations added as you requested and I also fixed some typo. Thank a lot for your review.--AM (talk) 16:15, 11 February 2010 (UTC)