- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- The result of this discussion was to merge AIRcorn (talk) 06:59, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
basically this article should be part of the laboratory Quality Control as it is used there
Yup. I agree with that. Levy Jennings charts are used only in Laboratory QC situations. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 126.96.36.199 (talk) 20:58, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
- Two good reasons for keeping separate are
- the inclusion of the chart article in Category:statistical charts and diagrams
- the need for more details (probably as maths formulas) of constricting the chart, which would be ill-suited to the more general articles discussion.
- Melcombe (talk) 10:49, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
- Considering the redundancy in the description with the main Lab QC article, I counter-suggest that the pertinent parts of this article could easily be merged without making the main article overly cumbersome, even if the additional details were merged. I also suggest that the Westgard Rules (see http://www.westgard.com/mltirule.htm) be referenced, as they are an important alternate to (or expansion of, depending on your perspective) Levy-Jennings. SongCoyote (talk) 19:43, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
I don't feel strongly about merging or not, but I do have a strong preference that if it is not to be merged then the spelling of the article heading should be corrected to "Levy-Jennings". —Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.8.131.52 (talk) 03:31, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
- Merged. Was one of the older merges in CAT:MERGE. The reasons not to merge were that it was in a category and that more details could be added. However, there have been very few additions in the last two years since the discussion and the category arguement is not that strong. If the math additions are made it can be split out again. AIRcorn (talk) 06:57, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.