Talk:Lachin District

Azerbaijan Low‑importance

	Azerbaijan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Azerbaijan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Azerbaijan-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AzerbaijanWikipedia:WikiProject AzerbaijanTemplate:WikiProject AzerbaijanAzerbaijan articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Artsakh Low‑importance

	Lachin District is within the scope of WikiProject Artsakh, an attempt to improve and better organize information in articles related or pertaining to Artsakh and Artsakhians. If you would like to contribute or collaborate, you could edit the article attached to this page or visit the project page for further information.ArtsakhWikipedia:WikiProject ArtsakhTemplate:WikiProject ArtsakhArtsakh articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts, which has been designated as a contentious topic.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

Lachin corridor[edit]

How does Lachin corridor correspond to Lachin raion? `'mikka (t) 23:51, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I would say the corridor itself is the path between the nearest approaches of Armenia and Nagorno-Karabakh - about 4 km apart, of an arbitrary width. I think all of Lachin could be considered the corridor. "Lachin corridor" does not have a specific boundary, it's simply the shortest path between Armenia and Nagorno-Karabakh. --Golbez 02:21, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Meowy, we have discussed this before. Karapetyan is a well known known Armenian nationalist and is not a reliable source. Please cite a third party source that Berdzor or Kashatag were ancient names of the region. Grandmaster (talk) 04:44, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it has, and you arguments are unconvincing. The source is valid, as is the information. What are your motives in questioning the origin of the name? Are you actually saying Lachin has been the name of this region for all time! Meowy 20:35, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It did not have any name. The district of Lachin is the Soviet creation, and the city was founded in Soviet times too. How could they have any old names? This is just invention of Armenian propaganda to justify the claims on Azerbaijani lands. Grandmaster (talk) 04:26, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You stated on the Lachin talk page that you accepted that Lachin had an older name (Ardalar), yet here you claim the opposite, that the settlement never had any old names. If you want to lie about things, at least try to be consistant. Meowy 23:43, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Meowy, same problem here as in Lachin article, the reference you use is not neutral. In addition, I found another good reference to the fate of Azeri Turks and Kurds in the region upon Armenian occupation. Atabek (talk) 06:06, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And the same for you as for Grandmaster. In saying that the reference "Armenia: A Historical Atlas", published by the University of Chicago Press, is not neutral, your arrogance and blatant propagandising knows no bounds. The removed text "and has been renamed Kashatagh, the district's name during the late-medieval period", which was fully referenced using page numbers in the above work, will be re-inserted. Meowy 23:52, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lachin District. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091114093402/http://www.azstat.org/statinfo/demoqraphic/en/2_1.shtml to http://www.azstat.org/statinfo/demoqraphic/en/2_1.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:52, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]