Jump to content

Talk:Lalji Singh/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: AmaryllisGardener (talk · contribs) 16:45, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Review

[edit]
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Notes

[edit]

I made some improvements to the article, but some things still need tending to:

  • "These findings later became the foundation for the discovery of a similar phenomenon of sex reversal in human." needs a ref.
  • All of the things listed in "Awards and Honors" that don't have refs need them. Nevermind
  • While not required, a little more copyediting would be great.

--AmaryllisGardener talk 17:07, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Assuming w.carter is done copyediting, I've decided to promote this article to GA. --AmaryllisGardener talk 01:16, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]