Talk:LeToya Luckett/GA1

GA Reassessment

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
I firmly believe that LeToya Luckett no longer meets the good article criteria.

The article is not very well written. There are several single paragraph sections and single sentence paragraphs throughout the article.
The article does not comply with the Manual of Style on some points. For example, endashes are not used between years (mostly the headings face this problem). There are also a few dates with no commas (for example, January 1 2009 is used instead of January 1, 2009) as well as a linked DMY date randomly in the article.
The article is not factually accurate and verifiable. There are several sentences and paragraphs without citations, thus failing WP:V and WP:OR.
There are also a couple sources that are questionable on their reliability, including, but not limited to: ConcreteLoop, That Grape Juice, YouTube, MonicaMania, etc.
Media samples do not have proper captions; they do not enhance the knowledge of the reader nor will they lose any without these files.

If these issues are not resolved within the next two weeks, I'm afraid I'll have to delist this article. Good luck to those who plan to work on this article. DiverseMentality 00:11, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It has been two weeks and the article still does not meet the good article criteria and is therefore being delisted. Please address any and all concerns before renominating this article for good article status. If you feel this reassessment was a mistake, please feel free to send it to WP:GAR. Thank you. DiverseMentality 03:08, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]