Talk:Lefaucheux M1858

France Low‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Technology / Weaponry / European / French

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	European military history task force
	French military history task force

Untitled

For some reason the picture/description box categorizes the Lefaucheux as a cap and ball revolver. This is pretty far off base as the Lefuacheux is the best-known pinfire model. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.64.50.216 (talk) 20:31, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

How do I change the title of the entry? It needs to be changed from 1858 to 1854, as that is the correct designation per French sources. The 1858 was a variant of the original model, which can still be covered in this entry. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tiewaz (talk • contribs) 18:01, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"circa" dates

The infobox image caption is "Lefaucheux-style revolver made in Liège, Belgium, circa 1860 – 1865. On display at Morges castle museum." The word "circa" (or "c.") applies only to the item immediately following. If the intent is that both dates are uncertain, it should say "c. 1860 – c. 1865". Either way, there should be a reference for the dates. This is important because Revolver copies this in an image caption. —Anomalocaris (talk) 08:30, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]