Jump to content

Talk:Legislative Council of Brunei

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

File:Panji-panji Brunei.gif Nominated for Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:Panji-panji Brunei.gif, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests March 2012
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Panji-panji Brunei.gif)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 17:29, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Weirdness/possible NPOV(?) in "Brief History" section

[edit]

I may be suffering a reading comprehension here, but there's a fishily positive (rather than neutral) tone throughout the "Brief History" section, especially in the last paragraph:

"Developments in the field of administration and constitution during the period of the appointment of Members have been helpful in maintaining and sustaining the nation’s goals towards prosperity and improving the quality of lives of the citizens and residents of Brunei Darussalam. During this period, it is proven that the experience of democracy through elections does not necessarily guarantee the integrity and stability of the country. In fact it can be concluded that the legal field since 1970 is able to carry out its responsibility in moving towards political and socio-economic stability."

Am I just being paranoid or does that sound like unduly positive spin? Especially with that last line being totally unexplained and unsourced? Xmoogle (talk) 22:31, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]