Talk:Letters rogatory

International relations: Law Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject International law (assessed as Mid-importance).

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Conventions

I'd like to update the section about conventions. Its misleading as very few countries have a process which operates outside a convention. The main convention which covers letters rogatory being the Vienna convention on consular relations, and there ain't many countries that aren't a party to that. See for example http://diaspora.legal/index.php/it/practising-law/back-office/letters-rogatory/ Suastiastu (talk) 13:44, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Letters Rogatory

The correct term is "Letters Rogatory" not "Letter Rogatory"Suastiastu (talk) 13:19, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Service of Process

This is a circular definition about jurisdiction. In fact the position is that a Court will have jurisdiction depending upon its own constition and empowerment - the service of its process may be facilitated or permitted in many matters outside its jurisdiction. The assertion is unreferenced. Suastiastu (talk) 13:22, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]