Talk:Linux Counter

Linux Low‑importance

	Linux portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linux, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Linux on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinuxWikipedia:WikiProject LinuxTemplate:WikiProject LinuxLinux articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Computing: Software / Websites Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Websites (assessed as Low-importance).

Is the Linux counter down for good? As of March 1, 2011 the page isn't accessible. KirkWolff (talk) 01:29, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It seems there is now a "New Linux Counter Project" to replace the old one. It's linked here: http://linuxcounter.net/main.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.108.146.236 (talk) 20:27, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tonight neither li.org nor linuxcounter.net is reachable. Both still have WHOIS records, though. — tbc (talk) 03:11, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

RIP

As one of the more seasoned Linux users and kernel hackers I would say this project should have been declared a historic monument perhaps a decade or more ago. I am kernel hacker since 1995 and registered around that time. The current site looks like a prank by some weirdo. Look at the page www.linuxcounter.net/statistics - its a joke. The original purpose of the project is completely lost. 2.247.247.134 (talk) 21:20, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You are not the only one. I am completely against "far" and often against "right", but the current instance just misuses the name to spread political messages and its very unprofessional. 78.35.53.102 (talk) 15:59, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Is the previous name of Ms. Löhner, mentioned in a paragraph of the History section, particularly encyclopedic?

I'm a mite doubtful about that, although it may help some join up other dots about her life - Ms Loehner's life isn't the topic of this article, and LiCo is. Ellenor2000 (talk) 16:07, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]