Talk:Linux XP
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Linux XP article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This page is not a forum for general discussion about Linux XP. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Linux XP at the Reference desk. |
 | This article was nominated for deletion on null. The result of the discussion was keep. |
| This page was proposed for deletion by an editor in the past. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Untitled
[edit]Excellen OS .. I have seen... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.93.56.114 (talk • contribs)
??
[edit]"An Activation Key of $19.99 is required after the 99th boot." If it is freeware then how come this is so? Also here it says there is no activation:
- Linux distributions are free software, not necessarily freeware. - Sikon 08:46, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
- If it's open source then isnt it legal for me to modify it and take acivation out and just make it go (by that I mean download a version thats alredy modified/cracked)? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by xyz
- Its GPLed so yes it should be legal as long as you GPL the modifed version(you know, I might just do this!) --Chris G 12:06, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
"The differences between Linux XP and Fedora may be entirely aesthetic"
May be? So then this may not be and if it may not be why is it written?70.15.191.119 (talk) 18:05, 5 April 2010 (UTC)