Talk:Lisa Goes Gaga/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Gen. Quon (talk · contribs) 04:35, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Image: Personally, I would move the image to the info box and add a decent rationale as to why it's being kept. Maybe "The picture illustrates one of the many "eccentric" outfits the show's animation staff designed for Gaga."
- I don't think the image is necessary.
Production: "Eighteen outfits were constructed to compliment Gaga's outré and eccentric reputation.[8] Although they did not collaborate with any of her stylists or creative director Nicola Formichetti, the design team conceived several ideas on what costumes to put on the character." -> "The design team for the series conceived eighteen outfits to compliment Gaga's outré and eccentric reputation, although they did not collaborate with any of Gag's stylists or creative director Nicola Formichetti."
- Done
Production: "Because of their unconventional appearance, this gave Jean more freedom in animating a large array of costumes, as these rapid changes "wouldn't be possible in real life"." -> "Due to the outfit's unconventional appearances, Jean was given more freedom to animate the large array of costumes, as these rapid changes "wouldn't be possible in real life"."
- Done
References: Use consistent dating methods (either YYYY-MM-DD, or MM DD, YYYY)
- Done
References: Some newspapers have their publishers in parenthesis (1, 4, etc.), others don't. Be consistent
- I'm not sure how to alter it. They are all formatted the same way (with the exception of the MTV refs).
- Oops, now I see. Done

Looks good! I will pass it now! Cheers.--Gen. Quon (talk) 23:50, 31 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]