Talk:List of Intel Pentium D processors

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Computing

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Computer hardware task force.

Merging Intel processor confusion into this

Should the Pentium D (and at least some of the Pentium EE) stuff from Intel processor confusion be moved into here? That'd mean adding additional columns for the fab technology, power, presence of EIST, presence of EM64T support, presence of XD bit, hyperthreading support, and virtualization (or perhaps with all the various technologies given as a list of items). If all the stuff from that page is moved into x86 processor list pages, that page could be removed. Guy Harris 21:41, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, and it's been done. Guy Harris 02:02, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

One or two dies?

Somebody added the comment "All Presler models are based on a single chip package which contains 2 individual dies (1 per core) of silicon, to allow for increased yield." Is that true of all the Pentium D processors, i.e. they're two dies in a single package, rather than two cores on a single die as is the case with Intel Core, Intel Core 2, and their Xeon derivatives? Guy Harris 19:52, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The statement itself is correct as all Presler models are based on utilizing to Cedar Mill cores. It is not true with all Pentium D processors, because not all Pentium D models are based on Presler. Coldpower27 07:11, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

antivandalbot made a mistake!

it has to be thermal design power not point! see german and french wikipedia discussions on this. 134.30.5.94 13:46, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External Links

Why is Mike's Hardware listed as an external link? The home page does not have any information specific to the article. Aren't there any better sites? Will add a few of them later. - InTeGeR13 18:28, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No more Double Core Nonsense

As explained again, regardless of how it is implemented two cores on 1 package is Dual Core, the correct terminology to describe this is monolithic vs multi chip module. You obviously haven't learned this lesson yet user 151.202.72.24. Coldpower27 19:57, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Actual Bus frequency

I think it should be noted that what this article states as FSB frequency is actually in mega-transfers or giga-transfers. Comparable article do a poor job of this too but they usually have a it in the notes. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.74.247.249 (talk) 01:17, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong Pentium D 960 TDP values?

On intels website: http://ark.intel.com/products/27522/Intel-Pentium-D-Processor-960-4M-Cache-3_60-GHz-800-MHz-FSB#@ordering

the TDP values are given as:

Ordering and Spec Information

Retired and Discontinued

Spec Code Ordering Code Step TDP

Boxed Intel® Pentium® D Processor 960 (4M Cache, 3.60 GHz, 800 MHz FSB) LGA775

SL9AP BX80553960 C1 95 W

SL9K7 BX80553960 D0 130 W

Intel® Pentium® D Processor 960 (4M Cache, 3.60 GHz, 800 MHz FSB) LGA775, Tray

SL9AP HH80553PG1044M C1 95 W

SL9K7 HH80553PG1044M D0 130 W

The SL9AP / C1 spec is shown to have TDP 95 W, and the SL9K7 / D0 spec is shown to have TDP 130 W. Anynonimous (talk) 17:12, 24 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]