Talk:List of London Broncos players

Rugby league Low‑importance

	List of London Broncos players is within the scope of WikiProject Rugby league, which aims to improve the quality and coverage of rugby league football related articles. Join us!Rugby leagueWikipedia:WikiProject Rugby leagueTemplate:WikiProject Rugby leaguerugby league articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Name

Quite a mouthfull. Might be better to name it List of Harlequins Rugby League players (the most recent name) with an explanatory note in the intro of the name changes. Then redirect List of London Crusaders players, List of Fulham RLC players and List of London Broncos players to the new article. Should make it much easier to search for. MRSC (talk) 17:54, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, thats probably the best move,

Ymron (talk) 18:53, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Believe it was all kept apart to keep the list of players on their own, but this would lead to overlaps as numerous players have played for the club under different names. After all it is just one club, with several guises throughout the years. On the one hand the long list would cover all the bases, but it is a very long name. Perhaps looking for a precedent with clubs that have undergone name changes.Londo 06 19:04, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It was moved before I had a chance to finish my point, but probably best if someone looks into the matter as their are now still lists for London Broncos players and this one says it is for the new name, but possibly does not do enough to address the fact that there are other lists out there and that players could legitimately exist on both lists as it stands.Londo 06 19:07, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]