Talk:List of New Thought denominations and independent centers

Religion: New religious movements Mid‑importance

	Religion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by New religious movements work group (assessed as High-importance).

Define New Thought on List page?

Can we please define "New Thought" on the list page so there's a context? I don't think anyone gets what "New Thought" is and I shouldn't have to guess from reading the first 2-3 entries, because I couldn't possibly understand what defines a new thought or independent center.

JFirestone 15:53, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That sort of definition or context is not placed on a wiki List page. I know of no wiki List pages that contain a definition.

A List page is always a sub-page from a topic page, and the topic is defined on its own page. If you add a definition to the List page, you are simply going to be recreating the TOPIC page.

See, for example, List of cookbooks and List of science fiction writers -- and note that they do not contain definitions of what a "cookbook" is or what "science fiction" means.

cat yronwode Catherineyronwode 19:11, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Meaning of "historically based"?

Can other readers tell what is intended by the phrase "historically based" on this page? I suspect this is not grammatically valid, and I wonder if there might be another way to phrase this. Other thoughts? - Sara FB (talk) 06:28, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of New Thought denominations and independent centers. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110721230158/http://www.newthought.info/denominations/ to http://newthought.info/denominations/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:45, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]