Jump to content

Talk:List of Twin Spica chapters

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

eBooks

[edit]

Arsonal (talk) 17:43, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Chapter listings

[edit]

Starting with volume seven, the English version (or at least, the one we get here in Australia - I can't really speak for America) has been packing more chapters per volume than the Japanese version. Volume ten, for example, contains Missions 56 through 64, which is the final chapter of the Japanese volume twelve. Since the cover art for volume twelve on the Random House website matches the cover art for the Japanese volume sixteen, I'm reasonably sure they intend to finish the series in the next two volumes - at four hundred pages each, they're certainly big enough for it. My question is this: is there some way to indicate differences between the English and Japanese chapter lists on the page? Do we want to write the different lists out in full, or just write a note saying something like "the English version contains Missions x to y"? --Belthazar451 (talk) 21:02, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of Twin Spica chapters. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:15, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]