Talk:List of esoteric healing articles

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alternative medicine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Alternative medicine related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Alternative medicineWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative medicineTemplate:WikiProject Alternative medicineAlternative medicine articles

Skepticism Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Things to do

Get the article past the deletion gatekeepers.
Locate occurrences of the phrase "esoteric healing" in Wikipedia articles and wikilink them.
Add descriptions on the entries.
Organize the entries by subject.
Include contrasts and related (e.g., negative energy, inner path).
This page fits Category:Indexes of articles better than Category:Disambiguation. Change to a list by moving the article from Esoteric healing to List of esoteric healing as described in Talk:Life form. (DONE - changed into list of articles)

Obankston (talk) 20:37, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Inclusion of 'Quackery'

I believe the including of a reference to the quackery article doesn't add anything to the list, but what it does do is cast a negative light on the article in general. Anyone reading it will see that quackery has been included amongst the other things, and will be lead to think of the other articles referred to in that light (a negative one). As an encyclopaedia, I believe this article would be greatly improved by removing the reference to quackery. Whether or not it all is quackery or not. Thoughts? Mlaclom1 (talk) 14:05, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quackery is included because the article relates to healing. In this list, readers would have many differences of opinion as to which items are positive or negative. This is compatible with Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (NPOV). Obankston (talk) 18:52, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018 cleanup

Some "see also" links were merged up and various links to redirects were made to link directly at the relevant article. This also results in multiple links to common articles. —Paleo Neonate – 14:46, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]