This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
This redirect was last assessed in December 2017.
This article appears tasteless to say the least, and written by someone from a personal viewpoint perspective. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 126.96.36.199 (talk) 01:58, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
This article does not constitute fact. It is merely an opinion of few enforced on everyone! For instance, the Re. 1 argument is flawed. Superstition or not, it has a different connotation. Same with cutting nails after sunset.
Article redirected to main article now, Superstition in India and yes it mostly dependent on personal viewpoints than quality sources. Main article can have a "list of superstitions" but right now it is already there. Lorstaking (talk) 13:59, 16 December 2017 (UTC)