Talk:Literae humaniores

	University of Oxford portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of Oxford, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the University of Oxford on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of OxfordWikipedia:WikiProject University of OxfordTemplate:WikiProject University of OxfordUniversity of Oxford articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Classical Greece and Rome Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

National curriculum[edit]

The article mentions "the removal of Latin and Greek from the British National Curriculum". Have Latin & Greek ever been part of the national curriculum in Britain? I don't think so. Bluewave 21:34, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

well, I suppose that is technically true given that we never had a National Curriculum before the current government. Perhaps it should say that they were not included in the National Curriculum, and so there is no time available to teach them in most schools. Can you come up with a more elegant way of putting it? Thruston 10:26, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

We certainly did have a National Curriculum "before the present government": it was introduced by the Education Reform Act in 1988, during Margaret Thatcher's third term for the Conservatives. 81.158.2.229 (talk) 02:39, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mods intensiveness[edit]

The article states: "Consisting until recently of 11 or 12 three-hour papers set across seven consecutive days, the examinations for Honour Moderations at the end of the fifth term were notoriously intensive; as of 2006 this is no longer the case due to the wide-ranging redesign of the way Classics is taught at Oxford, necessitated by the omission of Latin and Greek from the British National Curriculum when it was introduced in 1988." I will be taking Classics Mods (1B) at Oxford in February 2007, and they will consist of 11 three-hour papers set over seven days. For the majority of classics students, Mods are still "notoriously intensive".172.213.37.208 13:26, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

a correction based on your experience would be welcome, but do bear in mind the WP:OR rule. Much of this section already borders on point-of-view stuff and lacks any proper references. Is there something published by the faculty I wonder that sets out what you have to sit? Perhaps we could refer to that.

But more importantly why are you editing WP when you should be reading Herodotus! Get on with your work at once! (only joking).

I sat Mods (B) in Feb 1983 and you have my deepest sympathy and best wishes for the next two months.Thruston 10:39, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ha. I sat Mods in the same year as you and added the setence after the one you quote in something like January 2007... 129.67.169.24 (talk) 15:40, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

lit. hum. meaning[edit]

When I read LitHum in the mid-1960s, I liked to think that it meant "rather humane letters" Pamour (talk) 12:58, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ambiguous line in introduction[edit]

Hi, I'm not quite sure how to parse the final 2 lines of the introduction. The paragraph currently reads:

The Latin name means literally "more humane literature", and was in contrast to the other main field of study when the university was first started, ie. "literae divitiores", aka theology. Lit Hum is concerned with human learning, and Lit. Div. with learning that came from God. In its early days, it encompassed mathematics and natural sciences as well. It is now an archetypal Humanities course.

It is unclear to me what "It" refers to in the final 2 lines. Were mathematics and natural sciences encompassed by Lit. Div. or by Lit. Hum.? What subject is now "archetypal"?

If I knew the answer, I would edit the copy myself. Obviously, I am ignorant about the topic!

Thank you, DDugan (talk) 19:10, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Literae Humaniores. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.oxfordtoday.ox.ac.uk/2002-03/v15n2/04.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 15:16, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notable Graduates[edit]

Is it a list of people who are notable, and also happen to be graduates?

Or is it more restricted - people whose notability is somehow related to them being a graduate?

If it's the first, then I expect there are many more candidates for inclusion. If it's the second, then perhaps Boris Johnson shouldn't be there - he left with a BA 2.1. MrDemeanour (talk) 17:34, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]