Talk:Little Things (One Direction song)/GA1

GA Review[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Calvin999 (talk · contribs) 11:37, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Info box

Use the length template, like on "I Will Be"
Done — Robin (talk) 22:47, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Put folk before pop, as f is before p

Done — Robin (talk) 22:47, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Put the music video link as an External link in its own section at the bottom of the article

Done — Robin (talk) 22:47, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Lead

"released in November 2012" → Say it was released on 11 November 2012 in its own sentence at the end of the para

Done — Robin (talk) 22:47, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"with the quintet" → A lot of people won't know what this is, best to just say the band or One Direction

Done — Robin (talk) 22:47, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

shipments, not sales. See here.

Not done; When comes to digital sales of singles, a certification denotes a number of sales. — Robin (talk) 22:47, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No, some countries are sales, some are shipments. Hence why I attached the link for you. — AARON • ^TALK

"The vocal ensemble" → One Direction. Ensemble is more for clothing.

Done — Robin (talk) 22:47, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Critical response

This section heavily focuses on the use of quotations. Several need to be in your own words or a mix of the two.
- I'll see what I can do. — Robin (talk) 22:47, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Live performances

I made some little edits
- Why did you remove UK from The X Factor; its just confusing now. — Robin (talk) 22:47, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Weekly charts

The Chart column needs the shading, like the Certification table

Done — Robin (talk) 22:47, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

2012 peaks and 2013 peaks should be in separate tables.

Done; all peaks where in 2012.. — Robin (talk) 22:47, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Certifications

The box should resemble this one

Done — Robin (talk) 22:47, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

References

FN2: Captial FM should not be in italics

Done — Robin (talk) 22:47, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

FN4: MTV News should not be in italics and the publisher is Viacom

Done — Robin (talk) 22:47, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

FN5: Don't SHOUT

Done — Robin (talk) 22:47, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

FN11: Has no publisher
FN12: About.com should not be in italics

Done — Robin (talk) 22:47, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

FN13: Same as FN4 above and should not be linked as this is the second mention
FN14: Has no publisher
FN16: BBC should not be in italics

Done — Robin (talk) 22:47, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

FN17: Has no publisher
FN18: Has no publisher
FN19: Has no publisher
FN20: Has no publisher
FN21: Allmusic should not be in italics

Done — Robin (talk) 22:47, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

FN24: Don't SHOUT

Done — Robin (talk) 22:47, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

FN45: Has no work parameter

Not done because it is a generic template. — Robin (talk) 22:47, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

FN46: Allmusic should not be in italics

Done — Robin (talk) 22:47, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

FN48: Same as FN4. Why is the country suddenly being used?

Done removed country as well; copy paste from 1D disco, where countries are always added. — Robin (talk) 22:47, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

FN49: WP:TWITTER, remove as it is self published.

Done — Robin (talk) 22:47, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

FN51: Same as FN48

Done — Robin (talk) 22:47, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

FN52: Has no publisher
FN54: Has no title, Idolator should not be in italics, and the publisher is missing

Partly Done; italics — Robin (talk) 22:47, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

FN56: Has no publisher and should not be linked as it already is in FN52

Partly Done; delinked

FN58: Has no publisher
FN59: Has no publisher
FN60: same as FN2

Done — Robin (talk) 22:47, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Publishers are needed to meet FA not GA; so I'm not adding them. — Robin (talk) 22:47, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No, you can get away without having a work parameter if it is unknown, but not for publishers. All references, regardless of what it is for, need a publisher. — AARON • ^TALK 22:50, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Status

On hold for 7 days. Please pay attention to your reference formatting in the future. — AARON • ^TALK 17:28, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reviewing, Aaron! — Robin (talk) 22:47, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

OMFG!!!!!! I thought I had already saved the adjustments to the article before responding to your posts; I closed the tab without saving all the adjustments, thinking it was an old version of article I had left open. I'll be back 2morrow............ — Robin (talk) 23:00, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've done everything you want, I guess. — Robin (talk) 14:09, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You haven't changed sales to shipments. All US certifications are according to shipments only. — AARON • ^TALK 16:11, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

But the way I have written it now doesn't indicate that the RIAA denotes its sales or shipments. — Robin (talk) 16:21, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

But that's not the point. It's incorrect. — AARON • ^TALK 16:22, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done — Robin (talk) 16:27, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Actually Australia is also shipments. New Zealand is okay though, they base certifications on sales. This is a handy page to know. — AARON • ^TALK 16:32, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Did the Aussie cert as well. — Robin (talk) 16:36, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Passing. — AARON • ^TALK 16:37, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.