Talk:Long Hard Road Out of Hell/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Homeostasis07 (talk · contribs) 22:51, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
Another @MagicatthemovieS: review, which seem to be getting easier each time. There was a single typo; a dash fix; I changed Composition to Composition and style per the MOS; I removed a small quote that didn't really add anything to the casual readers' understanding of the topic; and I re-arranged a couple of sentences in the Music video sub-section: [1]; [2]. Other than those: perfecto.
- All images are creative commons, with exception of the audio file which is less than the 10% limit and has a valid fair-use rationale for this article.
- Prose is well-written and engaging, spare the single typo I rectified above, and all accurately transcribed from reliable sources.
- Earwig's tool showed no copyvio, spare the usual direct quotations.
- No disambiguation or external link issues found.
Happy to promote this. Homeostasis07 (talk) 00:07, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall: