Talk:Louis I of Hungary/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Miyagawa (talk · contribs) 22:15, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Ok, I'll be giving this one a review over the next few days. Miyagawa (talk) 22:15, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for starting the review. I think this is an amazing article and I believe it really deserves this nomination. Also, Hungarian history is awesome. --Simboyd (talk) 22:27, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Criteria[edit]

Good Article Status - Review Criteria
Further information: WP:WIAGA

A good article is—

  1. Well-written:
    2. (a) the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct; and
    (b) it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.Cite error: The <ref> tag name cannot be a simple integer (see the help page).
  2. Verifiable with no original research:
    3. (a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline;
    (b) reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose);Cite error: The <ref> tag name cannot be a simple integer (see the help page). and
    (c) it contains no original research.
  3. Broad in its coverage:
    4. (a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic;Cite error: The <ref> tag name cannot be a simple integer (see the help page). and
    (b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
  4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
  5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
    6. [1]
  6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
    7. [2]
    (a) media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content; and
    (b) media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.[3]

Review[edit]

  1. Well-written:
    2. Criteria Notes Result
    (a) (prose) The reviewer has no notes here. Pass Pass
    (b) (MoS) The reviewer has no notes here. Pass Pass
  2. Verifiable with no original research:
    3. Criteria Notes Result
    (a) (references) The article is fully cited. Pass Pass
    (b) (citations to reliable sources) Taking good faith on all citations as they're offline (as well as some which are foreign language sources too). Pass Pass
    (c) (original research) As previous. Pass Pass
  3. Broad in its coverage:
    4. Criteria Notes Result
    (a) (major aspects) The reviewer has no notes here. Pass Pass
    (b) (focused) The reviewer has no notes here. Pass Pass
  4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
    5. Notes Result
    No issues here. Pass Pass
  5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
    6. Notes Result
    No stability related issues. Pass Pass
  6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
    7. Criteria Notes Result
    (a) (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales) No problem with any of the images. Pass Pass
    (b) (appropriate use with suitable captions) No problems with the captions. Pass Pass

Result[edit]

Result Notes
Pass Pass The reviewer has no notes here.

Discussion[edit]

  • General
    • Sorry about the delay with this review - I've completed a few basic checks and found that there are quite a few duplicated wikilinks within the document. The easiest way to find these is to use User:Ucucha/duplinks.
    • You also need to double check the citations in the article to correct the order in which they appear (as some of them don't appear numerically).
  • Childhood and youth
    • "often delivered him on his shoulders" - can you clarify this? Are you referring to him getting rides on a knights shoulders? It is just that the him on his part lends confusion as to which one you're referring to.
To be honest, I took no part in writing this article and I'm not sure what is meant by that. It probably refers to the fact that the knight carried Luis on his shoulders.
    • "but he did not administer his province" perhaps "but he did not administer the province" instead?
I'll fix it.
Sorry for being so useless for all this time. I didn't really know all of this was my responsibility. Also, could you please clarify what you mean by "double-checking the citations for their order"? Are you saying they should be put in an incremental manner like this and not like this? --Simboyd (talk) 21:34, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
That's right. Miyagawa (talk) 18:06, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
There, I think I rearranged all of them where it was necessary. --Simboyd (talk) 21:34, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations[edit]

Congratulations on making it to today's listing on the "Did You Know..." section of Wikipedia Main Page. The process of making it the listing takes a bit of effort and involves the quick cooperation of many editors. All involved deserve recognition, appreciation, thanks and applause.

Best Regards,
  Bfpage |leave a message  09:42, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Additional notes[edit]

  1. ^ Vandalism reversions, proposals to split or merge content, good faith improvements to the page (such as copy editing), and changes based on reviewers' suggestions do not apply. Nominations for articles that are unstable because of unconstructive editing should be placed on hold.
  2. ^ Other media, such as video and sound clips, are also covered by this criterion.
  3. ^ The presence of images is not, in itself, a requirement. However, if images (or other media) with acceptable copyright status are appropriate and readily available, then some such images should be provided.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Louis_I_of_Hungary/GA1&oldid=1038142170"