Talk:M-116 (Michigan highway)/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: --PCB 23:02, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- I will put the article on hold for the issues below.
- Pass/Fail:
- Perhaps a sentence or more in the lead about the realignments.
- Done. Imzadi 1979 →
- I cannot locate Lincolen Lake.
- Which lakeshore? Michigan or Lincolen (It might be Lincoln)?
- Fixed the typo. Imzadi 1979 →
- Through sand dunes? So highways can go within dunes?
- Yes, they can. You're reading that statement too literally, but yes a highway can run between and through the dunes area. Imzadi 1979 →
- Is acres supposed to be converted to square kilometres or hectares?
- I don't know that it matters, but I dropped the km2 to let it pick, and {{convert}} picked hectares. *shrugs* Imzadi 1979 →
- "May or June" needs to be rephrased. Make it sound sure while still being factually correct.
- You can't. Based on the map dates, that's the most specific that be written based on the sources. Imzadi 1979 →
- A new alignment to M-116? If so, please clarify that M-116 was the route that was realigned.
- Since the paragraph has not mentioned anything but M-116 to that point, context says that yes. Further explanation would be both redundant and superfluous. Imzadi 1979 →
- Perhaps clarify that the extension east along Ludington Avenue was a result of the US 10 shift?--PCB 23:21, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
- Once again, the context of the change is clear, and inserting that addition would be redundant and superfluous. Imzadi 1979 → 01:03, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
- So much for your very long vocabulary; I am going to pass the article. --PCB 01:46, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
- Once again, the context of the change is clear, and inserting that addition would be redundant and superfluous. Imzadi 1979 → 01:03, 28 February 2011 (UTC)