Talk:M-157 (Michigan highway)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: ---Dough 48 72 02:31, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
The sentence "Just a year later, that iteration was decommissioned, and the road obliterated." sounds awkward, consider rewording "iteration" and "obliterated".
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Article could use an image, but not required.
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Just one small concern with the route description and then I'll be willing to pass it. Therefore, article is on hold. ---Dough 48 72 02:31, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I changed the word "iteration" to "version", but obliterated is a valid word choice, since the first M-157 wasn't just decommissioned as a state highway and transferred to the county, it was removed, and not only that, but there's no trace of another road on the satellite photos that I can see. Imzadi 1979 → 03:18, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I will now pass the article. Dough 48 72 03:22, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]