Talk:M-46 (Michigan highway)/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Thurgate (talk) 22:03, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- prose: (MoS):
- prose: (MoS):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
-
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- No edit wars etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Comments
[edit]1. enters Saginaw proper. Suggest - removeproper
2. Van Dyke Road.Between Elmer. Between needs a space.
I've put the article on hold for seven days to allow you to address the issues I've brought up. Feel free to contact me on my talk page, or here with any concerns. Thurgate (talk) 22:03, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
- For number 1, that would be wrong. The "proper" is there to distinguish between the city of Saginaw and Saginaw Charter Township, so it's needed. As for the second, that easy fix has been applied. Imzadi 1979 → 00:27, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
- Ah fair enough and meh I like to take a hands of approach to GA reviews. Anyway nice work. Passed. Thurgate (talk) 00:33, 5 March 2011 (UTC)