Talk:MOLPRO

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software.

Chemistry Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemistry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of chemistry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChemistryWikipedia:WikiProject ChemistryTemplate:WikiProject ChemistryChemistry articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The paragraph below has been added by User:Peter.Knowles who is an author of MOLPRO. It may be correct, but it reads like a specific point of view and has no third party source that this code is better than other codes. Does anyone have such a reference or can help to retun this to the article in better shape?

"As distinct from other commonly used quantum chemistry packages, the emphasis is on highly accurate computations, with extensive treatment of the electron correlation problem through the multiconfiguration-reference CI, coupled cluster and associated methods. Using recently developed integral-direct local electron correlation methods, which significantly reduce the increase of the computational cost with molecular size, accurate ab initio calculations can be performed for much larger molecules than with most other programs. Furthermore, with new explicitly correlated methods the basis set limit can be very closely approached." --Bduke 08:40, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have added this back, but severely modified it to be more neutral until third party sources can be found to state that this code is distinct from other codes in these respects. --Bduke 01:32, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]