Talk:MS Adzharistan

MS Adzharistan has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: November 19, 2023. (Reviewed version).

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Military history: Maritime / European / German / Russian & Soviet / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	European military history task force
	German military history task force
	Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force
	World War II task force

Soviet Union: Military Low‑importance

	Soviet Union portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Soviet Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Soviet UnionWikipedia:WikiProject Soviet UnionTemplate:WikiProject Soviet UnionSoviet Union articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:MS Adzharistan/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Tomobe03 (talk · contribs) 09:34, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'll review this article shortly.--Tomobe03 (talk) 09:34, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reading the sentence The Soviet-built ships had two decks and a depth of hold of 7.7 metres (25.3 ft) implies, at least as I understand it, that the German-built ships had a different number of decks and depth of hold, but the Krim-class article makes no difference in those that regard. Could you clarify if there was any difference between the Soviet and German built ships in terms of decks and depth of hold? --Tomobe03 (talk) 23:23, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Data is contradictory with the best data in Budzbon, et al. Lloyds says Krim had 3 decks, but her sister Gruziya only 2, which seems very dubious. I'm not sure if there's any difference in depth of hold between the German and Soviet-built ships. Aside from minor differences in dimensions, engines and a disparity of 300-odd tons in displacement, the ships appear to be virtually identical. The German ships were faster though, as they had finer hull lines forward with less water resistance.

Without clicking the Sovtorgflot/BSSC links, I'm wondering if Sovtorgflot is an "umbrella" cargo shipping company and the Black Sea State Shipping Company its affiliate? Maybe the two terms could be explained in the briefest terms possible to help readers quickly understand what the companies were. --Tomobe03 (talk) 23:23, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The 1930 dates (years actually) for completion and entering the service noted in the infobox are not mentioned in the body text nor referenced. --Tomobe03 (talk) 23:23, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Most GA requirements appear to be met, there are just a few issues noted above. --Tomobe03 (talk) 23:23, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sturmvogel 66 has this one slipped under the radar?--Tomobe03 (talk) 09:39, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review. See if my changes are satisfactory.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 16:01, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, everything appears to be in compliance with the GA criteria. Thanks--Tomobe03 (talk) 11:07, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Promoting. Congratulations Sturmvogel 66 on work as good as always!--Tomobe03 (talk) 11:26, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]