Talk:Mañana, Mañana/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: JayJay (talk · contribs) 03:25, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I will begin the review shortly JayJay^{What did I do?} 03:25, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

One Comment, usually the music sample would be in the Backround of Composition sections.

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	No problems
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.	Good
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.	Good
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).	I'm weary about Reference 2 I know it's to lyrics website and describing what the song is about lyrically but general those kind of links are placed in External Links section. Reference #10 is dead, there is a problem with References 7,8,9,11,12 are not redirecting only redirecting to the current chart. Only 7 & 8 need to be fixed but they are fine currently.
	2c. it contains no original research.	Good
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.	I feel like this article is rather short and doesn't address somethings. Were there any live performances, how many records did they sell for this song, were there any reviews? Some of those topics need to be addressed or clarified. Been clarified.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).	Stays on topic
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.	Stays neutral
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.	No problems
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.	No Problems
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.	Good
	7. Overall assessment.	I will wait a few days to see if any improvements have been made, then I will make my decision whether to pass it or not. Thanks for the review. I'll probably finish it up at the end of next week due to personal reasons outside of Wikipedia. As far as coverage goes, this song has limited coverage compared to more popular songs and even harder to find information considering the age of the song. See my other GAs No Podrás and Nunca Voy a Olvidarte. Erick (talk) 19:14, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply] Hi, I just wanted to say all the Billboard references that include something like "Week of (whatever)" are not redirecting and even if you go to the archives it only says the top 10. This is happening for everyone. You might find something searching Google books. I will try to search Google Books and see if anything comes up. JayJay^{What did I do?} 00:41, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply] I'm sorry, but can I be given another week to finish the GAN? I haven't been well due to personal reasons outside of Wikipedia. Erick (talk) 17:35, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply] Are planning on finishing this or improving it soon? JayJay^{What did I do?} 23:04, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply] I plan on finishing it once and for all on Tuesday. Erick (talk) 20:09, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply] Since it's clear that you are not going to work on it, I am passing it anyways. JayJay^{What did I do?} 00:51, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]