Jump to content

Talk:Mack 10 discography

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Featured listMack 10 discography is a featured list, which means it has been identified as one of the best lists produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 27, 2014Featured list candidateNot promoted
March 28, 2014Featured list candidatePromoted
Current status: Featured list

Boldfaced in singles table

[edit]

I have once again removed the boldfacced from the singles table and will explain it further here. Wikipedia:Record charts covers "...using and displaying record chart information in music-related articles." My first removal was reverted with the edit "Not a record chart," which I agree with but the table uses record charts and needs to follow the guidelines on record charts. Specifically: "Within the table, no chart positions should be boldfaced, as this violates Wikipedia's policy regarding neutral point of view." Aspects (talk) 13:59, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see how this violates the neutral point of view. This is not a record chart. You're cutting and addinc words to make it sounds like that policy should be applied to this article. This just shows the position, it's not a record. Tasc0 It's a zero! 22:48, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
If I don't get reply from you I'll revert your edit. I have to say that I don't agree with you. Tasc0 It's a zero! 22:06, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The first quote I used is to show how Wikipedia:Record charts would apply to a discography article, so that the second quote is the part of the policy in regards to boldfaced chart positions that should be followed on a discography article. Aspects (talk) 22:56, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
But that policy was made for a RECORD CHART table. This is just a discography. It's not a RECORD CHART. You even admit it. You're the only one with tones of edits removing the boldface from discography articles, where clearly there are no record charts. Tasc0 It's a zero! 22:34, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Here is the full quote from Wikipedia:Record charts: "This page gives some guidelines for using and displaying record chart information in music-related articles." This page is a discography, which is a music-related article, that is displaying record chart information. Therefore this page falls under this Manual of Style guideline. Aspects (talk) 20:36, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I will reply and continue the conversation here. Not in my talk page.
Let's clear something out: This page gives some guidelines for using and displaying record chart information in music-related articles. The chart positions should be organized into one table, and the table should be formatted using class="wikitable sortable".
If you just click on the record chart link, it will appear what a record char should look like. You can see that in this article, neither in Westside Connection there's a table similar to it. Now, if you continue doing this editing I'll report the issue. And like I said before, you even admitted this was no record chart. I hope you understand. Thank you. Tasc0 It's a zero! 00:23, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

<outdent>First off, I was agreeing with what I thought you were saying that this article itself was not a record chart, but this is a music-related article that uses record chart information. Billboard Hot 200, Top R&B/Hip Hop albums, Billboard Hot 100, Hot rap singles and Hot R&B/Hip-hop singles are all record charts that are being displayed here, so they need to follow this Manual of Style guideline. Aspects (talk) 03:01, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't care if it's a music-related article. The policy says only y record charts tables. These tables DO NOT follow the record chart's MoS, therefore, the policy you keep naming shouldn't be applied. Tasc0 It's a zero! 06:22, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 9 external links on Mack 10 discography. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:31, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mack 10 discography. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:09, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mack 10 discography. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:07, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Mack_10_discography&oldid=1201229557"