Jump to content

Talk:Magnum Rolle/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Brad78 (talk) 22:19, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lead
Early life
High school
Sophomore
Junior
Senior
2010 Summer League

Looks a good basis of an article. If you can address all the points above, I'll come back for a second look to see if there's anything else that needs doing. Well on the way though. Brad78 (talk) 22:58, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Everyone now looks pretty smashing. If the reference for his father isn't watertight, I would leave it out for the time being, but whether you go on to look at FA or not, it would be good to add something in if you get better references.

Everything else either looks great, or your comments above give good explainations.

The last thing I did spot though is that link 41, "Pacers acquire Rolle in 2nd round" is deadlinking. I don't know if it's either a typo in the link url or whether it's been moved. It probably needs either fixing or maybe finding another reference. Brad78 (talk) 22:41, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed it was an AP story and guessed it wouldn't be difficult to find an alternative. Brad78 (talk) 20:23, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Everything now tip-top. Very good job and thanks for the minor improvements needed during the GA review. Brad78 (talk) 20:34, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]