Talk:Maniac Magee/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Hello Maniacmagee and others! As your reviewer, I will be checking this article against the WP:GACR. My concerns will be listed below soon. --Edge3 (talk) 18:32, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Themes section is OR, since its only source is the book itself. Are there any outside sources you could use?--Edge3 (talk) 18:42, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Is there any info out there on the development and publication history? That kind of a section would be very useful. The Lightning Thief would be a great guide for you to use. --Edge3 (talk) 18:47, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- You can also incorporate the "Two Mills and Norristown" section into the new section. --Edge3 (talk) 18:49, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm putting this nomination on hold until the information requested above is added. After that, I will do a more thorough check of writing style and sourcing. --Edge3 (talk) 18:54, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Edge3, thanks for the review - I'll see what I can do before the week is up. I think I'm the only one working on this, but even if I don't finish before then I'll at least know what direction to take it in the future. Maniacmagee (talk) 22:35, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, sounds good!--Edge3 (talk) 22:57, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Have you searched on Google yet? I found a lot of promising hits on Google Books. --Edge3 (talk) 21:09, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Since the article has made no progress in the last week, I'm failing this nomination. Feel free to renominate once you find the information you need.--Edge3 (talk) 15:34, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Okay - sounds good. I haven't had time to work on it. I found some good references (e.g. on Google books), but don't have access to them.Maniacmagee (talk) 22:17, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]