Talk:Manzano Group
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 3 August 2020. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Manzano Formation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140731140924/http://fossilworks.org/ to http://www.fossilworks.org/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:20, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
Revived in 2006
[edit]Following the discussion on whether to delete the page, which was inconclusive, I went ahead and worked to make the article a discussion of the historical significance of the abandoned group. To my bemusement, I found that the name has been revived for a Statherian sequence in the Los Pinos Mountains, and this seems to be catching on. Live and learn. The article has been adjusted accordingly -- and I have refrained from snark about the wisdom of reviving a historically significant group name for a completely unrelated sequence of units. --Kent G. Budge (talk) 19:02, 28 August 2020 (UTC)