Talk:María Pacheco/GA1

GA Review

Passed. ... sawyer * he/they * talk 18:29, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Grnrchst (talk · contribs) 09:31, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Sawyer777 (talk · contribs) 18:54, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

sounds like a super interesting topic! i'll try to get through this by the end of the week. ... sawyer * he/they * talk 18:54, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

comments

since her father is mentioned in the lead, it'd be good to name & link him. ... sawyer * he/they * talk 19:24, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
on the same note, Following the outbreak of the Revolt of the Comuneros, could use a date for clarity ... sawyer * he/they * talk 23:25, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Added name and date. --Grnrchst (talk) 08:09, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
the archive.org link for Fink De Backer 2004 isn't working for me; it says "item cannot be found" ... sawyer * he/they * talk 21:49, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed. --Grnrchst (talk) 08:10, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
source check:
all of the sources look excellent in terms of quality/reliability; published by academic publishers, etc. i'd love to see the sources listed in the further reading section used, but i won't ask you to learn Spanish for this project haha.
i found Fink De Backer on google books, and spot-checked both it and Fleming 2018 - everything came up good! ... sawyer * he/they * talk 05:42, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm actually fluent in Spanish. The reason I didn't use the books is because I don't have easy access to paginated copies; I have access to some as ebooks, but they lack page numbers; others I can only find in libraries hundreds of kilometres away. I could add info from the RAH source, but it would mostly be trivial additions, most of it is already in here. --Grnrchst (talk) 08:16, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
ah, that makes sense. thanks for clarifying! ... sawyer * he/they * talk 19:09, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
in terms of copyvio, no issues found.
i quite like the prose style, it's very engaging.
MOS is all good.
no issues with broadness or focus; all the major aspects of what i'd expect from a biography are there, and it doesn't go into too much obscure detail.
the article is neutral enough, discussing both the contemporary negative views of Pacheco and more modern reinterpretations of her legacy.

... sawyer * he/they * talk 19:24, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

only just noticed this, because i hadn't looked too much at the infobox - the infobox gives her death location as Porto, and her resting place as Porto Cathedral, but this isn't mentioned in the body. that'd be a good thing to get sorted out. ... sawyer * he/they * talk 19:26, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Her burial in Porto Cathedral was actually mentioned by the RAH source, so I've added that in there. --Grnrchst (talk) 11:44, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
where possible, i'd like to see dates & artists' names in the image captions, but that's more of an informal suggestion on my part than anything with the GA criteria. no issues with the images generally. ... sawyer * he/they * talk 19:40, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Done. --Grnrchst (talk) 12:01, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
looking good :) ... sawyer * he/they * talk 18:26, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.