Talk:Maryland Route 291/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Racepacket (talk) 19:57, 1 March 2011 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
No disamb. links or invalid external links.
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- "After crossing the Chestertown Branch of the Northern Line of the Maryland and Delaware Railroad," - at grade or bridge?
- "crosses the Centreville Branch of the Northern Line of the Maryland and Delaware Railroad" - at grade or bridge?
- At intersection with MD 298, it is named Cypress Street.
- I changed "crosses" to "intersects" in both sentences with the railroads. I understand MD 291 is marked as both Cypress Street and River Road at that point in Google Maps. I went with the name in the HLR, River Road. VC 11:15, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
- B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
- A. Prose quality:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- Are there any construction projects planned for the route?
- Should the history section say when the grade separation with U.S. 301 was built? (May be different than the roundabouts)
- No construction projects are planned. I supplemented the last sentence of the History by mentioning both the bridge and the roundabouts were built in 1999. VC 11:15, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars.
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- This article represents significant work by its author. Putting review on hold for you to address concerns. Racepacket (talk) 10:15, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you for your review, Racepacket. VC 11:15, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
- This article represents significant work by its author. Putting review on hold for you to address concerns. Racepacket (talk) 10:15, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
- Pass or Fail:
- Congratulations on another good article. Racepacket (talk) 15:41, 2 March 2011 (UTC)