Talk:Max Mosley/GA1

GA Review

I will review this article. I have familiarized myself with its recent GAR discussion. Robert Skyhawk (Talk) 18:33, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

First Review by Robert Skyhawk

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

I have reviewed this article, and it appears to meet the Criteria for Good articles.

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:

B. MoS compliance:
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
I am impressed by the thoroughness of the citiations for quotes especially.

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:

Again, this article definitely meets the criteria in my opinion. The issue about the Nazi organization which was raised during its reassessment seems to be resolved. Congratulations to User:4u1e and all other involved editors. I will now proceed to take all necessary steps to award this article GA status. Thanks, Robert Skyhawk (Talk) 20:14, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Many have contributed, but Tommy turrell is the other major contributor. Thanks for taking the time to do the review. 4u1e (talk) 20:52, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]